Bottlebrush Education

All lessons › Research & Sources: Start Here › Lesson 2

Australian primary science · Years 3–4 · Lesson 2 of 3

Who Made This Page?

Inquiry question: Which source would best answer our pond-frog life-cycle question?

Marked no materials needed

Evaluating supplied source cards

Open interactive lesson and slidesExplore topic

What students learn

Compare fictional webpage authors, purposes and evidence rather than trusting page design alone.

Success criteria

Preparation and materials

Before this lesson: Know that a source is where information comes from. Fictional page cards are not live websites.

  • Charged iPad per individual or pair — One per student or pair
  • Projector — One

Teacher setup

  1. Open the assigned lesson and present the slides.
  2. Show the lesson QR; students enter one or two names and start.
  3. Use the lesson timings: allow 45–55 minutes plus first-use sign-in time. Do not add copying to fill a full hour.
  4. All evidence is supplied in the lesson. No equipment, worksheets or external websites are necessary.

Safety and adaptations

  1. Screen-based evidence inquiry only. Do not perform physical experiments or imitate hazards described in the case files.

Review your school policies and curriculum requirements before teaching.

How to investigate

The lesson sequence should leave pupils with evidence to interpret, not only an activity to finish.

  1. Read the research question carefully.
  2. Find the author, purpose, date and evidence for each page.
  3. Choose a best starting source and a useful checking source.
  4. Explain why a good-looking webpage is not enough.
  5. Identify one question to ask before quoting either source.

Teacher modelling prompt

For fictional card A, identify the named education team, update year, purpose and evidence. Contrast one item with the toy shop's lack of life-cycle evidence.

Record and explain evidence

Recording question: Which source would best answer our pond-frog life-cycle question?

Page cardUseful clue / concernUse or check? Why?
________________________________________________

Example recording headings; record actual observations, including inconclusive results.

Discussion prompt

Which statement is better supported and why?

Provided example or reference data

Fictional webpage comparison cards

Page cardWho / whenPurposeEvidence shown
A · Pond Museum GuideNamed museum education team; updated 2025Explain frog stagesLabeled stages and references to field observations
B · Cute Frog ShopToy retailer; updated 2026Sell plush toysNo life-cycle evidence
C · Frog Fun BlogAuthor not listed; undatedEntertainA colourful illustration, no source list
D · Wetland Group NotesNamed volunteer group; dated 2024Share sightingsLocal egg and tadpole sighting notes

Check the data source in the teacher lesson. Illustrative or fictional data are not measurements collected by your class.

Check understanding

What should pupils know? What does 'purpose' mean in a source check?

Explain with evidence: Why might B be less useful for the life-cycle question?

Apply the idea: A site has no author but an attractive diagram. Should you quote it without checking?

Teacher answer guidance and saved classroom work are available through the main lesson experience where supported.

This is an independently developed resource. Curriculum-code links support teacher planning and are not government endorsement or certification. Investigations, digital activities and equipment must be checked for your classroom before use.
Open this lesson Next lesson › ‹ Previous lesson